Is she representing "American values," more so than any other American? |
When Sarah Palin emerged as a public figure two years ago, she was heralded as a new face of the GOP, as a young voice to energize far-right supporters who feared that their party had strayed from their original values. Her appeal was that she could identify with average voters, as a relative outsider to politics. She connected, some say, in a very basic way to middle America. Perhaps she was too unconnected to politics, as her several major slip-ups proved.
In the present day, the Tea Party movement has become of symbol of alienation in modern America. Christina O'Donnell, the new poster girl of the Tea Party has advertised her campaign as representing a "philosophy centered on the core values of the great American tradition." It seems to me that she tries to advertise herself as the most patriotic candidate, the one most connected to America. But in actuality, how can one person claim that they are more connected to America, more so than any other American? I'm confident many Americans could make that claim. When someone wants to "institute the values that made America great," how can they say that they have a better handle on those values than any other active member of American society?