A mock textbook cover? No. |
Cesar Chavez: Not significant enough for textbooks? |
The reason this was such a landmark decision because Texas has the largest textbook market in the nation, and publishers are heavily influenced by what material must be included. While the article did say that other states nationally would be minimal, neighboring states would feel the pressure to purchase the sam textbooks as Texas, for cost and accuracy. This is a total miscarriage of the process of education, and I am personally in favor of a national governing body to dictate the content of textbooks.
I'll conclude this discussion with a plug for a favorite magazine of mine: The Week. My aunt first sent me a gift subscription about two years ago, and since then I've been an avid fan of its unbiased view of national and world events. Instead of having staff writers, The Week has a team of editors who summarize the best articles from national and global news outlets, and extract phrases and sentences from those articles within the summary. The end result is usually a short, to the point three paragraph article, with a two polar voices and a moderate commentator's opinion. The format is genius, and I recommend this magazine to anyone with an interest in fairness and world events.
a recent copy of "The Week" magazine |
Leland,
ReplyDelete"As a liberal, I am morally disturbed by this claim; as an American, I am appalled." -- WHY?
You might think that the quote speaks for itself, but your reader might not understand what you are implying.
"I am personally in favor of a national governing body to dictate the content of textbooks."
Think about what this means in terms of local control for schools and autonomy for classroom teachers. What if the national curriculum was politically conservative? How then you you feel?
Lastly, I, too, love The Week: it got my eldest daughter hooked on politics and current events!