Who is the Real Authority on Childhood?

       As our American Studies class continues our discussion on a child's development, and when it childhood actually ends, a new point has snuck into my mind: who are we (about 45 high school juniors, and 2 high school educators) to discuss what defines "childhood," and more specifically, the childhood of others? Obviously, our wandering discussions have no bearing on the lives of others, but can each person speaking in the room truly say that they are a decent, or even reliable, source on a child's development into adolescents? I believe no researcher, student, small child, or anyone else can speak general truths about "childhood."

       It is interesting how the common public puts so much faith in the research of aged PhDs when it comes to child research. They are the ones furthest from childhood in their life; and perhaps the least understanding of what modern childhood is like. One of the top groups in this field is the Society of Research in Child Development. Upon quick inspection of their home page, they do not seem to market themselves as a site friendly to the casual online viewer, or even child. This apparent lack of concern for their research topic is understandable; the average child or new mom would not look at this page for their own interest.

       A child could not claim to be an authority on childhood; they cannot fully express the complex emotions they are experiencing at their age. I am speaking only in regard to approximately ten year olds, but even after the age emotions become such a clutter in the teenage years.

       The only fair age to analyze youths is... none. Although many will formulate opinions on childhood, no definite facts/generalizations can be accredited by anyone of any age.